Joel Klebanoff: Stuff & Nonsense

To worry is to be. To be is to worry.

NEWSFLASH: New Regulatory Agency

The government today announced the formation of a sweeping, new regulatory agency that will oversee and govern the entire financial sector. Banks, stock brokerages, mortgage lenders, finance companies, hedge funds, mutual funds, asset management firms and insurance companies, among others, will all fall under the purview of this agency.

This new regulatory body will be called NOHAFCA (No One Has A Frigging Clue Agency). Its mandate is to design and implement regulations that will attempt to limit or, better yet, eliminate the financial sector’s excesses, management mistakes, accountability shortcomings and governance failures that were major causes of the current economic meltdown.

Within the scope of the laws duly passed by the government, NOHAFCA will have broad powers to create and enforce any regulations that it considers to be in the best interest of consumers, businesses, taxpayers and the financial industry itself.

The first task of NOHAFCA will be to acquire and install the world’s most powerful computer and the necessary software. This computer will be tasked with the job of randomly generating financial sector supervision policies. It will also create random regulations to support those policies. These policies and regulations will then be used to govern the financial sector.

When asked why randomness was important in policy and regulation generation, Fanny WatdefÃ?ch, the newly appointed chairperson of NOHAFCA, said, “In the past, we’ve tried to gather the best minds together, perform research, study the issues, and come up with intelligent, facts-based policies. This often led to financial sector debacles because, in a nutshell, no one has a frigging clue. Thus, randomly generated policies and regulations can’t be worse than what we have traditionally enacted. In fact, they stand a very good chance of being a considerable improvement.”?


Categorised as: economy | news (yeah, right)


30 Comments

  1. MadMadMargo says:

    Fanny Watdefuch? I think I remember her from college, she didn’t have a friggin’ clue back then either, this sounds like a perfect match.

    • MadMadMargo: Yup, it’s probably the same one. Real party animal, right? Always getting in trouble, but she never new why. Perfect for a government agency.

      Comedy Plus: Yeah, what’s big government without a little Fanny? Thanks! And you’re welcome!

  2. Comedy Plus says:

    Bwahahahahaha. There just had to be a Fanny something or other in there. There just had to be. I love it. Thanks for the chuckles.

    Have a terrific day and weekend. :)

  3. Lies says:

    Yah, it will all be like this soon:

    tomecity.com/liblog/?p=64

  4. Stephanie says:

    *Sigh*

    I wish this wasn’t so true.

  5. Chris says:

    Little known fact: Fanny Watdefuch was born in Bonn, Germany and her maiden name is Dummenschitt.

  6. Tamara says:

    You know, Joel…I have long waited and hoped , and dreamed of…a blog post just like this one. I knew there had to be a man left out there with a deeply romantic side that could make a woman’s flesh quiver at the mere reading of his fanciful writings …and cause her to swoon over thoughts of hearing such romantic , sweet, imaginative love words whispered to her in person..

    My heart just will not stop racing after the above post…as it fulfills my greatest expectations and then some…

    Would that I could only match your amazing propensity for sending the delicate hearts of others soaring into bliss…with such beautiful , thought provoking and titillatingly enticing visions such as this amazing post has wrought …

    I will leave you now as I must have time to recover from this assault on my emotions, my dreams and perhaps even my most secret fantasies….

    ps ( yes I know I’m quite the smart aleck ) how ya doing? !

    • Tamara: Yes, you are quite the smart aleck, aren’t you? Here we were in this flirtatious, back-and-forth conversation a while back, then you disappear for a couple of weeks, not commenting on, among others, my Cooking Up Romance and Commenting on God and Loveposts, both of which were designed to elicit flirtatious remarks (in a weird sort of way), and now you come back on my New Regulatory Agency post? What am I to think?

      P.S.: I’m doing well, or as well as can be expected considering I’m me. How are you?

  7. Carl says:

    “… This new regulatory body will be called NOHAFCA (No One Has A Frigging Clue Agency) …” Hahahahaha… Right on!!! You are the master. I bow to you. Your Majesty.

  8. Tamara says:

    Joel

    I like to do the unexpected and bewildering …and I think you should support me in this as it keeps me quite amused and probably leaves you , and anyone else who is exposed to my oddities , feeling somewhat challenged, and therefore, protects against consistent boredom.

    How flattering that you even noticed I was missing for a couple weeks! Particularly as you HAVE been so busy with your new quests for romantic bliss …and especially gratifying since the last time I went missing for two weeks , the only person to comment on it was the clerk at the video store , who I assume was only concerned with the drop in weekly rentals due to my absence ..

    Perhaps I need to get a life and/or find romantic bliss too…

    Guess I’d better catch up with the previous blogs and comments and see if any new ideas or suggestions that were shared with you in your quest could possibly apply to my own miserably drab existence

    Glad to hear you’re well :)

    Tamara

    • Tamara: Unexpected and bewildering can be good, entertaining and engaging qualities … unless you want people to understand you.

      Of course I missed you. We had a good conversation going and then you disappeared. How could I not miss you? It’s not as if I have a life of my own.

      I’m very sorry to hear that you have a miserably drab existence. I have a copyright on miserably drab existences, so I’m going to have to insist that you either cease and desist being miserably drab (but please continue with your existence; I don’t want that on my conscience) or start paying me royalties.

      P.S.: It’s cruel of you to say the word regulatory resonated with you strongly and profoundly and not say why. I’m intrigued. Are there any regulations that unduly restrict you? If so, are those regulations intended to protect public morals? If so, please let me know and don’t leave out any details.

  9. Tamara says:

    p.s plus, can I help it if the word regulatory resonated with me so strongly and profoundly?

  10. Tamara says:

    I could certainly understand the use of the word ‘cruel ‘ in regard to my disappearing for two weeks and depriving you of my scintillating posts….but in relation to the ‘regulatory’ comment? My , you’re sensitive….sigh

    Perhaps it wasn’t the use of the word regulatory but the obviously dapper and charming man behind the word..I don’t know..I seem to have completely confused myself now ( which happens far more often than I can readily account for )

    As for your copywright on the miserable , drab existence phrase , I will graciously defer to your much more distinguished reputation and will henceforth be speaking of my own existence only in the most glowing terms ( which I’d wanted to do, anyway, but refrained out of false modesty )

    I’m stumped by the comment about ‘understanding me’ as I think that might be the first time anyone has ever referred to even remotely considering taking that task on …

    • Tamara: the obviously dapper and charming man behind the word“. If you have a mental image of me, it would be appropriate at this time to have that mental image blush. Thanks! Dapper and charming? I don’t think those are the appropriate words, maybe scruffy and vexatious, but picture me however you like. And in whatever state of undress you like.

      If glowing terms are appropriate for you life then don’t be modest here. I like to enjoy myself vicariously because I find it so damned difficult to do so directly.

      Oh, come on. I’m sure hundreds of guys are aching to understand you. The question is, have any of them succeeded?

  11. Tamara says:

    sigh I misspelled copyright….I told you that you leave me all flustered…now there’s proof ….I hope this blushing subsides soon

  12. Tamara says:

    So you’re not dapper and charming…

    Couldn’t you have left me with my slightly skewered impressions that were bringing me such special moments of joy and imagination and greatly enhancing this supposedly fantastic life of mine?

    And , no, I don’t think anyone has succeeded in understanding me, although..I believe my therapist is trying desperately to , since he occasionally pierces me with an intense and/or astounded look ( like an Amish person in Circuit City ) and says “who ARE you ?” So I give him points for effort…

    NOHAFCA? oh, silly me..I thought that stood for Nearly One Hundred Adults Find Conan Amusing …I guess I’d better start paying attention

    Is it against the rules to just carry on a random diatribe that isn’t relative to any certain post and is even , in fact, probably rather boring for your other blog friends to peruse?

    I admit I didn’t read the rules before taking part in all this
    ( somewhat ) meaningless activity so I might perhaps be crossing all kinds of boundaries here… but what other way can I shamelessly continue to fulfill my need for continued dialogue with someone so scruffingly vexatious?

    Please advise before I begin to receive outraged , hurling insults from other visitors to the site that could wound and scar me emotionally for life ( or some scathing reply from yourself which would be equally devastating )

    • Tamara: Personal integrity is important to me I didn’t want to deceive you about the dapper and charming thing.

      “Like an Amish person in Circuit City” … now that was hilarious. I wish I could come up with stuff like that. You should write a humor blog.

      As to random diatribes. There are no strict rules, but my understanding of these bloggy things is that the comments are generally meant to be responses to the blog posting. I would prefer to keep it that way, but I’m not strict on that.

      Personal conversations that are totally irrelevant to the associated post is what email is for. I don’t highlight my email address because I don’t want to make it too easy for spammers, but because I originally set up my Web site and this blog to promote my book, I wanted to give people a way to get in touch with me should someone want to interview me (never happened). So it’s not very difficult to find my email address. The only problem is, if I’m not expecting an email from you it may get lost in all of the spam that I get. (Maybe someone did send me an interview request and I never saw it.)

  13. The Tarot Queen has finally answered your question on Ask Me Anything.

  14. ettarose says:

    Ok Joel, you and Tamara need to get a room, hell I forgot what my smart ass comment was going to be. Sheesh

  15. Paul says:

    When in doubt…create a new agency! Gives everyone else a new scapegoat.

  16. Sugar Cribs says:

    wow so many regulations today :D

Leave a Reply